Logo
LOUERN - 4E Business Builder
 
4_eggs.jpg

4E - Business Builder

Four golden eggs to build
your business

Main Menu
Home
Louern Newsletters
Discussion Area
Survey Overview
Who We Are
Overview
What We Do
4E Business Builder
Resources
Overview
User Login
Username

Password

Remember me
?
No account yet?
Print E-mail

THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ADVANTAGE

- Profit whilst others Wither and Perish -

1    OVERVIEW

How to, profit from innovation whilst others wither and perish.

Professional service firms differentiate themselves by developing specialist expertise focused on targeted markets. However, specialisation can become both the greatest strength and greatest weakness of a firm caused by clusters of functional specialists resulting in ‘myopic group think’.

Recent advances in the Theory of Brain Specialisation provide crucial insights into why some professional service firms experience difficulty with creative thinking and innovation and struggle to achieve entrepreneurial advantage.

This briefing explains how peak intellectual and creative thinking can be achieved through understanding how our unique mix of mental preferences and avoidances ultimately affect our preferred modes of thinking. It explains why people gravitate naturally to professions where they can exercise their preferred modes of thinking and provides a proven methodology to develop Creative Thinking and Innovation.

The methodology for Creative Thinking and Innovation was pioneered in management education programs at General Electric designed to meet GE business needs for innovation in products and services.

2    ENTREPRENEURIAL ADVANTAGE

Creativity Thinking and Innovation can be powerful sources of differentiation to achieve Entrepreneurial Advantage for professional service firms.

Creativity Thinking is the process of generating new ideas and methods.

Innovation is the process of transforming ideas into value - added reality

Entrepreneurship is the process of targeting unmet client needs and finding new and better ways of meeting them through Creativity and Innovation.

Entrepreneurial Advantage is the ability to “think – the – unthinkable” and create a highly profitable business venture which meets unmet client needs.

The firm that is a market leader will have unlocked the power of creative thinking and innovation to achieve entrepreneurial advantage.

3    ENTREPRENEURSHIP REQUIRES COURAGE

Entrepreneurial firms will develop new and better ways of delivering what their clients want and in doing so create competitive advantage. This requires:

  • Passion for improving client satisfaction by adopting new and better ways to anticipate and meet their needs.
  • Looking beyond traditional client expectations for professional services
  • Persistence with creative solutions especially when the going gets tough
  • Daring to be deliberately different
In the final analysis it is really about having courage in your convictions and seizing the opportunity.

4    THE RISK OF UNDERESTIMATING THE RATE OF INNOVATION

Underestimating the rate of innovation seems to be a common failure, even for those who are at the forefront of driving it.

“Heavier-  than – air flying machines are impossible”
President of the Royal Society 1895

“Everything that can be invented has been invented”
Charles Durel, Commissioner, US Office of Patents 1899

“I think there is a world market for maybe five computers”
Chairman, IBM 1943

“Computers in the future will weigh no more than 1.5 tons”
Popular Mechanics 1949

“Groups with guitars are on the way out”
Decca Records turning down the Beatles, 1962

“640K ought to be enough for anybody”
Bill Gates, Microsoft 1984

We have observed a strategic shift by leading professional service firms to become more innovative in meeting their client’s needs. The driver appears to be recognition that client expectations and freedom of choice demands new ideas and methods of meeting their needs. Monitoring and understanding this change has become our prime area of interest as firms develop new ideas and methods for:

  • Business models – the way of doing business
  • Collaboration and Networking – the strength of business relationships
  • Core and Support Business Processes – efficiency and effectiveness
  • Service Design and Delivery – value for money
  • Interfaces with the client – differentiating the client experience

5       WHAT DO CLIENTS WANT?

Lucinda Schmidt reported in BRW 3 March 2005 on the BRW – St George Client Choice Awards, that what clients actually want is:

  • “Solutions and resolution, rather than statements of possibilities. They want professionals to take a view (but to respect the clients right to choose)
  • To feel important and respected. They want professionals to be responsive and to develop a good relationship
  •  Commercial acumen. They want professionals to take time to understand their business and their specific needs
  • Fee management. They want professionals to act responsibly with their money and to build trust by suggesting ways to reduce their fees.”
6       THE CHALLENGE TO BECOME MORE INNOVATIVE

Professional service firms generally promote their creative problem solving capability to provide innovative solutions for clients. However, the rhetoric does not often match the reality as highlighted in Lucinda Schmidt’s article:

 “All professions need to do better on innovation. This was the attribute that clients said they were most disappointed with, especially from accounting firms.”

We believe that root cause of this lack of creativity and innovation is that professional academic courses place much more emphasis on developing strong logical analytical skills than developing creativity which is considered the province of the Arts faculties. This lack of balance, between the logical and the creative, explains much of the rigidity and myopic vision evident in professional service firms where new ideas and methods are often actively discouraged.


 
“As far as adoption of new ideas – our board is deeply rooted in the 19th century, and believe that Queen Victoria is alive – I am sure that some of them are active members of the flat earth society”                             Anonymous



Creativity can be encouraged by giving people the opportunity to express their intuitive thoughts and feelings on sensitive issues. This will lead to results which will be quite different to conclusions reached by logical analysis alone.

The ability to unleash a firm’s creative ability requires practice leaders who are willing to work outside their comfort zones as they challenge this rigidity and adopt new ideas and methods.

7       THE LEADERSHIP ROLE IN SPONSORING CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

The leadership imperative is to make creativity and innovation a cornerstone of business strategy. It is really about sponsoring creative thinking within a disciplined business process focused on the bottom line by:

  • A compelling Vision linking Creativity to Strategy
  • Enthusiasm to embrace new ideas and methods
  • Providing Resources, Encouragement and Support 
  • Walking – the - Talk
We cannot emphasize enough the critical need to Walk – the – Talk.


A professional services firm was experiencing difficulty in retaining young associates. The young professionals looked with cynicism at the firm’s Mission statement which said in part: 

“We will deliver outstanding value – added innovative services to our clients
We sponsor professional growth and provide fulfilling careers for our people”

Unfortunately the Rhetoric did not match the Reality of partner behavior!


We believe that a series of initiatives focused around the following four areas are vital for Professional Service firms that desire to become more creative and innovative

Image

Leadership – to enhance relationships with clients, colleagues and staff

Culture – to create a high performance client – centric firm

Strategy – to achieve profitable growth by increasing market share

Differentiation – to create sustainable competitive advantage

8       WHOLE BRAINED THINKING

 

8.1    THEORIES OF BRAIN SPECIALISATION AND MANGEMENT


Whole brained thinking research provides an understanding of how some professions struggle to be more creative and innovative.

Dr Roger Sperry who won the Nobel Prize in 1981 for his Left Brain – Right Brained research proved that the Left and Right hemispheres of the brain are specialized. He observed that;

“Each hemisphere of the divided brain seems to have its own separate and private sensations; its own impulses to act. The main theme to emerge …. Is that there appear to be two modes of thinking, verbal and non verbal, represented rater separately in left and right hemispheres, respectively, and that our education system, as well as science in general, tends to neglect the non-verbal form of intellect.”
The vital connection between brain specialization and different styles of management thinking was provided by a professor of Management at McGill University, Henry Mintzberg who asked the penetrating questions;
  • “Why are some people so smart and dull at the same time?
  • How can they be so capable of mastering certain mental activities and at the same time be so incapable of mastering others?
  • Why is it that some of the most creative thinkers cannot comprehend a balance sheet, and some accountants have no sense of product design?
  • Why do some brilliant management scientists have no ability to handle organizational politics, while some of the most politically adept individuals cannot seem to understand the simplest elements of management science? ”
   
Planning on the Left, and Managing on the Right
                                                                                                            Henry Mintzberg
                                                                        Harvard Business Review June 1976

8.2       NED HERRMANN’S WHOLE BRAIN MODEL 

Ned Herrmann evolved his four - quadrant model for whole brained thinking whilst he was head of management education at GE’s Management Development Institute. His model was an innovative synthesis of Sperry’s research and the Triune Brain Model developed by Paul MacLean in the 1970’s which was based on human evolution and highlighted the importance of the limbic system.

Ned Herrmann’s Organizing Principal for the Whole Brained Model is four interconnected clusters of specialized mental processing modes, that function together simultaneously and iteratively, making up a whole brain in which one or more parts become naturally dominant.

Ned Herrmann developed the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) in 1978 as a metaphoric model to emulate the specialized structure of the brain to and provide quantification of an individual’s relative preferences for specialized thinking.  The degree of dominance becomes evident from the mental preferences indicated by the HBDI.

HERMMANN’S FOUR QUADRANTS AND THINKING PREFERENCES


A – UPPER LEFT CEREBAL

 

ANALYSER
Logical
Analytical
Fact – Based
Quantitative
RATIONAL SELF
UPPER RIGHT CEREBAL- D

 

VISUALISER
Holistic
Intuitive
Integrating
Synthesizing
EXPERIMENTAL SELF

B – LOWER LEFT LIMBIC

ORGANISER
Organised
Sequential
Planned
Detailed
SAFEKEEPING SELF

LOWER RIGHT LIMBIC - C

PERSONALISE
Personalise
Interpersonal 
Feeling – Based 
Kinesthetic 
Emotional
FEELING SELF


The preference for Rational Thinking or Creative Thinking explains a person’s preference for career choices and acquisition of competencies.

8.3       BRAIN PREFERENCES OF TYPICAL PROFESSIONSs

 

A

 

Lawyers
Actuaries
Research


D

 

Architects
Entrepreneurs
Marketing
B

 

Engineers
Accountants
Administrators
C

 

Counselors
Social Workers
Sales



9         APPLICATION OF WHOLE BRAINED THINKING

9.1      A POWERFUL ORGANISAIONAL DIAGNOSTIC

The application of the HBDI can provide an excellent diagnostic tool to Map the Firm’s Thinking Preferences and highlight both Strengths and potential Weaknesses.

The challenge for professional service firms with strong A & B quadrant preferences for Logical and Structured thinking is to encourage more entrepreneurial creative thinking by including C&D quadrant input.


The need for innovation became apparent to a firm that had experienced considerable business success with a suite of services. However, with the passage of time these services were no longer relevant to their client needs and the firm experienced a dramatic downturn in profitability.

My first gut reaction was that the firm was using the past as its point of reference. Not surprisingly, mapping the firms Thinking Preferences with the HBDI showed very strong clusters in the A and B quadrants and low scores in the C and D quadrants.

The learning outcome was that for A and B quadrant firms there is considerable risk of complacency based on past success and that services must be continually innovated to be relevant to changing client needs.


The corresponding challenge for professional services with a strong C & D quadrant preference for Intuitive and Interpersonal thinking is to encourage more Logical and Structured thinking.


A consulting firm had achieved spectacular revenue growth. However, it was losing money because of poor – and in some cases non-existent – business processes. Costs could not be allocated to projects and there was no reconciliation between Quotation and Cost of Delivery.

Mapping the firm with the HBDI highlighted the predominance of D quadrant professionals and the need for Business Process Management.

Lack of Business Process Management is often the Achilles heal of entrepreneurial organizations where growth has outstripped the organizations management systems


9.2    A CATALYST FOR CULTURAL CHANGE

Our thinking preferences govern the way we approach problem solving by using our preferred functions and avoiding our least preferred functions. Avoidance of our least preferred functions sub-optimises the decision making process.

Professions with strong A and B quadrant preferences will normally solve problems entirely in a left brained rational mode. However, their preferred solution will be very close to the status quo and at best will only represent an incremental change. The right brain (especially the D quadrant) is the only part of our brain that deals effectively with change.

Also people with strong A and B quadrant preferences will not recognize the importance of factoring human emotions and feelings into the solution.

The whole brained decision making process ensures that blind spots are avoided. This highlights the advantages of Whole Brained Cross-functional Problem Solving Teams which are effective in:
  • Breaking down traditional functional boundaries
  • Solving complex business problems
  • Developing a teamwork culture and
  • Generating innovative solutions.

WHOLE BRAINED DECISION MAKING PROCESS

 

A – Step 1 Preparation

Information Gathering and Analysis of Facts

 

Objective – To Define the problem

Step 2 Generate Ideas – D

The process of Incubation Visualisation and Illumination

 

Objective – To Brainstorm alternate Solutions

B – Step 3 Reality Check

Involving Detailed Review

 

 

Objective – To Stress Test Solution

Step 4 Validation – C

Consider Personal and Interpersonal Issues

 

 

10.1    DESIGNING THE NECESSARY BEHAVIORAL SHIFT

A relatively small behavioral shift in situational functioning – towards increased use of C and D quadrants – will be a catalyst for cultural change towards a more future – orientated entrepreneurial firm.

 

 FROM A&B  TO MORE C&D
 QUADRANT BEHAVIOR  QUADRANT BEHAVIOR
From constrained
to more experimental
From bureaucratic
to more  flexible and free
From closed to new ideas to more open to new ideas
From inward looking to more visionary
From authoritarian management to more collaborative management
From supervision
to leadership
From impersonal to humanistic
From precedent – based to future – orientated
From business planning to strategic planning
From rules and regulations to trust

In designing the shift from A&B quadrant to more C&D quadrant behaviors it is important not to ignore the organizational strengths that A&B quadrants have given the firm.

  • Attention to facts and figures
  • Detailed plans and schedules
  • Accurate financial reporting
  • Impeccable financial management
  • Attention to legal issues
  • Detailed administrative systems
  • Standard Operating Procedures
  • Quality Management Systems

 

The best approach is to define the firm’s Strengths and Weakness through a SWOT Analysis which also looks at the Opportunities for Innovation and Weaknesses of the Status Quo. This provides a Gap Analysis as a basis to design the required behavioral shift to become more entrepreneurial.

10.2    INNOVATION IN DESIGNING THE CLIENT EXPERIENCE

Innovation in designing the client experience should be viewed from the perspective of the client – “how will it add value for me?”

Focus innovation where new ideas and methods will have the greatest impact on the interface with the client to enhance the Client Experience.

  • Knowledge Centered Leadership
  • Relationship Centered Leadership
  • Business Process Management
  • Teamwork and Collaborative Management

10.3    BECOMING A MARKET LEADER

The firm that dominates its targeted market is:

  • The most creative and innovative in designing the client experience
  • Consistently more entrepreneurial in marketing than its competitors
  • More efficient and effective in service design and delivery
  • Legally and financially impeccable

This strategic shift is achieved by focusing on four key areas.

Leadership – to enhance relationships with clients, colleagues and staff

Culture – to create a high performance client – centric firm

Strategy – to achieve profitable growth by increasing market share

Differentiation – to create sustainable competitive advantage

The firm that is a market leader will have unlocked the power of whole brained thinking in these four areas to achieve the entrepreneurial advantage.


ABOUT THE AUTHORS


Bede Boyle A.F.A.I.M. – Principal Louern Consulting

Louern specialises in assisting professional service firms deliver outstanding results through innovative business development programs which focus in achieving dramatic and profitable growth in B2B sales.

Bede is sought after as a corporate advisor and consultant to industry, government and professional service firms. He has over a decade of experience as a director of professional service firms whose clients included BHP, BHP Billiton, Coca – Cola Amitil, Commonwealth Bank, Countrylink, Dairy Farmers, Freightcorp, GM Holden, Newcastle Port Corporation, Powercoal, Rio Tinto, State Rail, QANTAS, Vodaphone and Zurich Insurance.

Bede was Chairman of Bywater McLean Pty Limited through to successful sale to Axon Group plc. He is a Director of Pacrim Environmental Pty Limited.
Bede is qualified to administer the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator which he uses to map organization Strengths and Weaknesses as part of a diagnostic process.

Brad Shields – Principal Louern Consulting

Brad is a successful Business Entrepreneur, experienced Business Development Manager and powerful Sales Management coach who specialises in developing customer focused organisations. Following extensive professional international experience with business enterprises in US, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, he established Louern in 2000.

Brad adds value in his innovative approaches to marketing, business development and sales for clients including Movements International, Bywater McLean, Axon Solutions, Targus, Grace Records Management and RBM Plastics.
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 26 July 2005 )
4E Newsletter
Monthly tips for
  * more prospects
  * more inquiries
  * better conversion
  * more repeat business
using the 4E System
Signup here
We will NEVER
 violate your privacy
 Free eBook when you subscribe
7 Website Errors
7 Fatal Website Errors